Bush authorizes a (not so) covert military action in Iran.[views:9554][posts:65]______________________________________ [May 24,2007 3:16pm - hungtableed ""] Kill em all and let allah sort em out :nuke: |
| _____________________________________ [May 24,2007 3:27pm - Josh_Martin ""] If ABC News knows about this, you can be sure that Iranian intelligence already knew anyway. This "leak" means nothing. If this actually works this is a great way to get iranians to start killing each other off so our soldiers don't have to do it. I'd like to see them develop a nuclear program with a civil war going on. Unfortunately, its a Bush plan so its bound to turn into a clusterfuck. 18 more months.... |
| __________________________________ [May 24,2007 8:22pm - Dankill ""] So pretty much you're saying that you don't believe that Iran has or ever has anything to do with international terrorism or that they are currently helping train fund and arm people in Iraq attack military and civilian targets? |
| ______________________________________ [May 24,2007 11:17pm - sacreligion ""] do you have any receipts? i'm just saying you can't do it on suspicion...that's what happened when we first went in Iraq. "They're funding terrorists." "They have weapons of mass destruction." "We have to stop Saddam." While he may have very well been a serious threat and the world might be a better place without him in power, it still was a move that is highly questionable. |
| _______________________________________ [May 25,2007 3:17am - y_ddraig_goch ""] [img] Just as long as we can enslave some of those |
| _______________________________ [May 25,2007 10:28am - Yeti ""] holy fucking shit. that girl is mesmerizing. she reminds me of what Mileena from Mortal Kombat would look like in the flesh. you cant see that Baraka style grill. |
| ______________________________________ [May 25,2007 11:38am - sacreligion ""] that's why you gotta go for kitana, man...same person, just no baraka grill |
| ______________________________________ [May 25,2007 11:59am - HailAtWork ""] sacreligion said:do you have any receipts? i'm just saying you can't do it on suspicion...that's what happened when we first went in Iraq. "They're funding terrorists." "They have weapons of mass destruction." "We have to stop Saddam." While he may have very well been a serious threat and the world might be a better place without him in power, it still was a move that is highly questionable. Haha, so true, the US never should have put Saddam into power, trained his men, gave him our tax dollars and tons of weapons. Funny huh? We funded terrorism, and now we're funding more terrorism under the guise of preventing it. |
| ______________________________________ [May 25,2007 12:00pm - sacreligion ""] it's a lucrative business, war is |
| ______________________________________ [May 25,2007 12:00pm - sacreligion ""] great population control of the poor, as well |
| ____________________________________________ [May 25,2007 12:05pm - FuckIsMySignature ""] HailAtWork said:sacreligion said:do you have any receipts? i'm just saying you can't do it on suspicion...that's what happened when we first went in Iraq. "They're funding terrorists." "They have weapons of mass destruction." "We have to stop Saddam." While he may have very well been a serious threat and the world might be a better place without him in power, it still was a move that is highly questionable. Haha, so true, the US never should have put Saddam into power, trained his men, gave him our tax dollars and tons of weapons. Funny huh? We funded terrorism, and now we're funding more terrorism under the guise of preventing it. that's the result of the "enemy of my enemy is my friend" ideology. |
| ______________________________ [May 25,2007 1:15pm - Yeti ""] sacreligion said:that's why you gotta go for kitana, man...same person, just no baraka grill hahahaha i bet Jade would do better. she is a nimble little minx. |
| _____________________________ [May 25,2007 1:19pm - pam ""] FuckIsMySignature said:HailAtWork said:sacreligion said:do you have any receipts? i'm just saying you can't do it on suspicion...that's what happened when we first went in Iraq. "They're funding terrorists." "They have weapons of mass destruction." "We have to stop Saddam." While he may have very well been a serious threat and the world might be a better place without him in power, it still was a move that is highly questionable. Haha, so true, the US never should have put Saddam into power, trained his men, gave him our tax dollars and tons of weapons. Funny huh? We funded terrorism, and now we're funding more terrorism under the guise of preventing it. that's the result of the "enemy of my enemy is my friend" ideology. My Foreign Policy professor called it the "asshole you know vs asshole you don't know" factor. "Yeah he's a prick...but he's OUR prick." |
| __________________________________ [May 25,2007 5:51pm - Dankill ""] I'm just saying that it's not like this is new. Intelligence agencies around the world have been saying for a couple decades that Iran is one of the biggest enablers of terrorism since the early 80s. And saddly, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" isn't going away anytime soon, nor is it new or are we the only ones to do it. Shit, how do you think the allies felt fighting along side a monster like Stalin in World War II? The Nazis vs the Soviets was one of the biggest "who is worse if they win?" questions ever when you look at how brutal both were and then what happened to eastern europe. |
| ______________________________________ [May 26,2007 12:47am - sacreligion ""] let's just agree that the world is fucked |
| ___________________________________ [May 26,2007 10:19am - Dankill ""] I can always agree on that |